Home > Arousal, Bodies, Breast Size, Breasts, Nudity, Statistics > Breast Size Counts

Breast Size Counts

The site VoyeurWeb.com has been in operation for years. It allows people to submit nude photos of women, these photos are published, and viewers can vote on the pictures: poor, fair, good, very good, or superb.

The site also runs contests, such as INSTANT Tit Flash Photos, and the results are tabulated in a manner I’ll discuss.

I’ve look at porn from time to time, and occasionally on a video I hear a young woman lament that her breasts are too small. This always makes me sad, not just because I am especially turned on by small breasts, but because these women think they have to be big–something they are not–to be sexy.

An example of Extremely Big Breasts--from Voyeurweb.com.

I’ve known lots of men who prefer smaller breasts, and I’ve often wondered what the statistics really are. I realized that using VoueurWeb.com I might be able to quantify the appeal of, meaning being aroused by, breasts of different sizes. I performed an analysis, and the results are shown in the table below.

Very Small Small Medium Big Very Big Extremely Big
In top 42 by number of views 5 4 7 9 7 10
Million Views/pic 5.0 4.4 5.9 4.3 4.8 3.7
In top 63 by ranking 1 4 12 24 13 9
Top ranking 4.65 4.75

In VoyeurWeb’s tit flash photo section, pictures are categorized in different ways. One way is by number of views. Another is by ranking–1 to 5 corresponding to poor to superb. The above table lists breast size across the top and methods of analysis on the left.

First row: In the first row I took the top 42 pictures rated by number of views, and I list how many of these top number-of-views photos there were of each breast size. Based on this information one might be tempted to conclude that viewers were most attracted  to Extremely Big breasts. It might be, however, that curiosity, rather than interest, skewed these numbers. Similarly, the number for Very Small breasts might also not be an accurate representation of viewer arousal. Excluding Extremely Big and Very Small breasts, it seems that Big, Very Big, and Medium breasts are more appealing than Small breasts. However, using the method of the first row seems to be problematic.

Think the problem this way: Let’s imagine that there are many more women with large rather than small breasts. An extreme example would be 99 large breast photos for each small breast photo. Imagine that viewers are looking at photos randomly and selecting something that they like other than breast size, for example skin color. Assuming that large and small breasts have, on average, the same skin color, there would be 99 large breast selections for each small breast selection. Total number of selections (views), therefore, does not accurately reflect interest. It could reflect distribution of breast sizes in the population.

An example of Very Big Breasts--from Voyeurweb.com.

Second row: Instead of looking at breast appeal as characterized by the total number of views, I tabulate the average number of views per picture of a given breast size. In other words, if there are ten small breast pictures in the top 42 by number of views, then I add the numbers of views of these ten pictures and divide by ten to get an average.

The second row of my table shows that Medium Breasts are preferred. The average number of views of a medium breast photo (in the top 42) is 5.0 million. Very Small is second. Extremely Big is sixth.

An example of Big Breasts--from Voyeurweb.com.

Third row: For the third row I looked at ranking–Poor=1, Fair=2, Good=3, Very Good=4, and Superb=5. I took the top 63 photos, rated by ranking, and I list how many of each of these photos falls into each breast size category. Big, Very Big, and Medium breasts are ranked highest, but when I looked at the actual ranking number I found little difference. The highest ranked Big Breast photo had a ranking of 4.75, while the highest ranked Very Small Breast photo had a ranking of 4.65.

An example of Small Breasts--from Voyeurweb.com.

Conclusion: Medium breasts seem to be slightly more appealing, on average, but other than that there isn’t much difference. And anyway, we all have to play the hands we’re dealt. Use the tools you have and play well.

An example of Very Small Breasts--from Voyeurweb.com.

This analysis is offered with respect for all women, regardless of appearance. Good looking is a bonus. It’s nice that counts.

  1. March 13, 2011 at 8:01 am

    Hi Matt, very scientific and useful research…as well as some nice photos to go with it. I would say that one factor that should be considered also is how many girls of each breast size would tend to post photos of their breasts onto the site. Would the tendancy be for girls with smaller breasts not to post, because of the perceived ‘need’ for larger is better.
    Personally I have had girlfriends with all manner and shapes of breasts. Sadly the ones with very large breasts often were quite overcome by their breast size, in that I often felt like I was going out with a pair of breasts on legs. Their personalities were completely taken over by the fact that they had large breasts. This in the end became quite boring for me, and I guess the analogy would be that of a guy with a huge cock who knows it and his whole personality becomes the fact that he is ‘well hung’.
    I do have to say that visually I am excited by small and large….normally it is the full picture that I need to see. Also I have a theory that I would like to investigate in time, which is that girls who have smaller breasts, in my experience, seem to have more sensitive nipples. This again may only be my experience.
    However, it is sad that man girls feel the need to have big breasts when so often a man really does look at the ‘overall’ beauty.
    I think in the past you have posted pictures of girls with the prettiest of faces and small breasts…I would always choose these over larger breasts and a less attractive face 🙂

    • March 14, 2011 at 8:25 am

      Being a physicist you are certainly in a position to poke holes in the scientific validity of this mini-study. I’ll just say that the study seems to agree with others I’ve read that medium breasts are most popular, and yet there is enough interest across the size spectrum that there is no compelling reason for any woman to feel her breasts are unappreciated.

      As far as nipple sensitivity versus size, I wonder. I think a study in this area would be beneficial. If I thought I could get a hold on it I’d be willing to undertake it. All I need are volunteers.

      As far as attraction strictly due to a woman’s physical gifts, faces are most important. Studies have shown that when a man looks at a woman the first thing he looks at is her face. We receive many messages that way, and we instantly rate a woman as desirable, or not, compatible, or not, and receptive, or not. Then we look at her breasts, though there’s many an ass man who wishes he could have the rear view.

  2. sextisfaction
    March 15, 2011 at 5:19 am

    I prefer the breast size to be proportional to the rest of a woman’s body

    • March 16, 2011 at 9:06 am

      Like art–all in harmony.

  3. March 16, 2011 at 2:36 am

    I have always preferred smaller breasts over larger ones. For my taste they seem to have more personality and I love that the nipples are accentuated. The worst is breast implants — I have never seen the beauty in these. That first photo that you posted is easily the least attractive of the bunch. I would go so far to say it is hideous.

    The older I get the mkore I like the braless look. Large or small, I like breasts that hang naturally.

    • March 16, 2011 at 9:04 am

      I hate “enhanced” breasts too, and many of the photos on Voyeur web were of enhanced breasts. I’m also not a fan of tattoos or piercings, but I can accept these more easily. I’m with you Woody. Natural is best, though I like pierced ear decorations if they’re reasonably discrete, and other ornamentation, like shaving or makeup, if it’s not overdone, can be nice too.

  4. March 19, 2011 at 5:59 am

    Small, medium, large, enhanced…it shouldn’t really matter. It’s the person’s total package that counts. 🙂
    Cheers!

  5. June 20, 2014 at 1:04 pm

    Wow that was odd. I just wrote an incredibly
    long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t show up.
    Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyways, just
    wanted to say superb blog!

  6. July 17, 2014 at 4:29 pm

    I am sure this article has touched all the internet
    users, its really really pleasant article on building up new webpage.

  7. August 7, 2014 at 9:51 pm

    Hello my loved one! I wish to say thbat this article is amazing, great written and include approximately all important infos.
    I would like to see more pots like this .

  8. August 7, 2014 at 10:55 pm

    I like what you guys are up too. This type of cllever work annd reporting!
    Keep up tthe very good works gguys I’ve inxorporated you guys
    to our blogroll.

  9. August 8, 2014 at 3:25 am

    Awesome! Its in fact amazing piece of writing, I have got
    much clear idea concerning from this piece of writing.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: